On Sunday, 4 October 2015 19:30:43 UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote: > There's no precedence for it as far as I know. The operator was only > designed for matrix multiplication (which, by the way, we ought to > implement it for Matrix).
Mathematica uses it for function composition. > There is a technical challenge in that functions in SymPy are > typically classes, meaning the operator would have to be defined on > the metaclass. We've been trying to get rid of our metaclasses because > they can slow things down and they make the code more confusing. I > believe it is doable, though. > Maybe we need two classes: function (no arguments specified) and function with args. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/00e21857-ff99-4a63-94f2-b8264a16abe1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
