On 15 January 2016 at 15:06, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In the released version (0.7.6.1), the systems are independent. In > master, the new assumptions (ask(), Q) read the old assumptions on > Symbols (is_positive, positive=True). > > For performance purposes, this was done in a way that prevents the new > assumptions from noticing contradictions (it was added to the old ask > handler system instead of the new satask handler system). This will > hopefully change in the future, but there are some performance issues > that need to be worked out with the satask system.
Does this mean that there is a third (newer) assumption system? > For now, I would recommend using the old assumptions. However, you can > play with the new assumptions. The goal in making the new assumptions > read the old was to make this easier to do. But it also makes it a confusing mish-mash of the two. What's the eventual goal here? -- Oscar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAHVvXxTJhd5gGULjDJU1sjyrfTxS3WLOLWH-ubxN2MMuKtvuMw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
