On 02/23/2016 05:46 PM, Carl Sandrock wrote: > ... > This matches your method. So this has saved me some tedious algebra, > but not the effort of finding the order in which to evaluate the > equations. I wish that sympy could do this automatically.
I agree. Maybe this could be added to https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/gsoc-2016-ideas#solvers Casually, there is a parallel thread on this list on that topic. On 02/23/2016 03:26 PM, Kshitij Saraogi wrote: > Hello, > > I am Kshitij Saraogi and I will be a GSoC applicant this year under SymPy. > > I wanted to discuss about the Solvers project.[1] < > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/gsoc-2016-ideas#solvers> > > After going through the discussions mentioned on the Ideas page, I would > like to get inputs on a few ideas for this project: > > ... > 3. Implementing more equation solvers: [3] > <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/10006> > > * System of multivariate linear equations. > > * Nonlinear multivariate equation solver. > > * Equations solvable by LamberW function (Transcendental equation solver) > > * Nested trignometric expressions. > ... @ Kshitij: Do you think our problem/feature request is already covered by issue 10006? Carsten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/56CC9779.7010909%40gmx.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
