On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 2:20:14 PM UTC+1, Fredrik Johansson wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 10:58:33 AM UTC+1, Subham Tibra wrote: >> >> Thank you Fredrik for the clarification. I agree to use annihilators to >> store the function inside. >> >> Regarding the numerical computation at a point, SymPy doesn't support >> numerical methods as of now AFAIK. As mpmath is included in SymPy, we can >> use `odefun` for numerical computation, but it doesn't support complex >> points. Is this good for now or do we need to implement a method when the >> point is complex? >> > > mpmath.odefun does support complex points. >
Oops, sorry, it doesn't do this directly. However, this is just a superficial restriction. It does support complex values, so you can always make a linear change of variables to move a complex path to a real interval. Fredrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/719d3dff-5b8e-4fb5-9516-6dad8c3acf3d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
