On Sunday, 30 August 2015 23:00:43 UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > That sounds like a good idea. Having them in a separate repo would make it > less of a big deal to include inline plots in the notebooks. >
Yes, I have strong feelings against checking in any inline plots (or generated binary data in general) into the SymPy repository. The issue recently surfaced here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/10869 Regarding doctesting the actual notebooks: I have been doing this in my projects for a while (rendering notebooks as part of CI process, thus never checking in any output data). See e.g. http://hera.physchem.kth.se/~chempy/branches/master/examples/ for an example. The rendering (and testing) is achieved by using nbconvert: ipython2 nbconvert --to=html --debug --ExecutePreprocessor.enabled=True *.ipynb In case someone wants to try to set this up (the CI servers would need to push artifacts somewhere on success). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/469c3185-d2a9-4e33-b045-fc20dbda9b37%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
