@brombo, I definitely agree there should be a system in place for easy conversion. I was thinking about allowing a user to input in whatever coordinate system they wanted but when implementing functions the vectors would get converted into rectangular coordinates, pushed through the function, and then converted back to the original coordinate system and returned. The functions already handle Cartesian coordinates so this would cut down on work and internal redundancy (i.e. we would avoid defining the functions again with different coordinate systems).
@ankur, Awesome, I'll take a closer look at it. Thanks for sharing! My general plan was to closely parallel the existing class definition for Cartesian coordinates. I figured this would help keep things organized and clear. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/72c0d30c-763f-4eab-bfb3-7aa50be61722%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
