"but there is still plenty of work to do" Can you please elaborate on what work is left to be done? I'd really like to implement changes in Assumption module.
On Saturday, 13 February 2016 00:09:22 UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > The ideas page on assumptions needs to be updated. There was a project > last year which did a lot of work on it (but there is still plenty of work > to do). > > The assumptions in SymPy are a bit of a complex topic. A good way to get > up to speed on them would be to start by reading my post at > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sympy/PHR136kdxc4/C2qs5obPGoMJ. > This was the state of things last year, before Sudhanshu's GSoC project. > Then look through Sudhanshu's merged pull requests on GitHub to see what > has changed since then > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Adebugger22+is%3Aclosed > > (this is also summarized in the release notes > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Release-Notes-for-1.0). > > Regarding C++, you would have to ask Ondrej if he wants to implement them > in SymEngine. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Anish Shah <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hello Sympy communities, >> >> My name is Anish Shah. I've a good amount of experience in Python. Since >> last few weeks, I have been contributing to Sympy and I'm loving it. >> For GSOC 2016, I'm interesting in assumptions module >> <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2016-Ideas#assumptions>. >> >> I have some questions regarding it: >> >> 1. The ideas page for assumption seems to be updated. The blog link >> mentioned in that post is not working anymore. Is there any alternate link? >> 2. Also, the pull request is merged. So, is the new assumption module >> done? Are there any new features/improvements that the community is >> expected in the assumption module? >> 3. There are many issues related to assumptions on Github. I will try >> solving some of them. Some of those issues are already solved, but they are >> not closed. Is there any particular reason? I will try to comment on those >> issues as I come across them. >> 4. There's one more idea about porting assumptions to C++. I have a fair >> amount of knowledge regarding C/C++ and I think I can work on that. Are >> there any guides regarding porting Python code to C++? >> >> Thank you for your time, >> Anish Shah >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sympy" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/f972482b-4f09-4116-8911-5f6fa9cea237%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/f972482b-4f09-4116-8911-5f6fa9cea237%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/2bf28864-d65d-4807-a26c-e7599a624550%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
