Hi Everyone!

The new SymPy Documentation Style Guide is nearly ready to be merged with
documentation. If you wanted to share any feedback please comment on the
pull request by Friday: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/17715

Thank you to everyone for all of your great feedback to date!

Lauren

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 2:49 PM Lauren Glattly <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Sympyers,
>
> Thank you to everyone for all of your great feedback so far! You can now
> review and share feedback on the new SymPy Documentation Style Guide in the
> pull request: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/17715
>
> Our deadline to merge the new guide with documentation is November 6, so
> early reviews are much appreciated.
>
> Thank you!
> Lauren
>
> On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 4:48:51 PM UTC-4, Lauren Glattly wrote:
>>
>> That's a much better example, thanks I'll swap it out!
>>
>> On Saturday, October 5, 2019 at 7:37:08 AM UTC-4, Chris Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe a more suitable phrase for quoting would be good since, in this
>>> case, "other" probably refers to a variable name (as in `__foo__(self,
>>> other)`) in which case it wouldn't be quoted. Something like "The term
>>> 'unrestricted necklace,' or 'bracelet,' is used to..." might work better
>>> for the example.
>>>
>>> /c
>>>
>>> On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 3:37:29 PM UTC-5, Lauren Glattly wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the formatting suggestions! I see your point about
>>>> symbols in the text and like what you did to make the examples stand out
>>>> more from the rest of the text. I reverted your edits and tried to recreate
>>>> them in RST (since that's what I'll be using to merge the guide eventually)
>>>> to see what you did, but the only one I left reverted was the second
>>>> example under "Spelling and Punctuation" where "other," is meant to be in
>>>> quotation marks to show American punctuation standards.
>>>>
>>>> The only issue I'm seeing with the examples is under "Formatting
>>>> Preferences" where two of the longer examples are being cut off. Does
>>>> anyone else see that in their system or know why that would be?
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 8:39:48 AM UTC-4, Chris Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I made some small edits to the page to try help with meta-formatting.
>>>>> Please feel free to revert or to use as a suggestion for further edits.
>>>>> Since you are writing about symbols in the text you might want to use
>>>>> different formatting there that is consistent with *that* context.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I tried some formatting to allow examples to stand out as
>>>>> separate from the text.
>>>>>
>>>>> /c
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 1:27:42 PM UTC-5, Lauren Glattly wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Sympyers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The new SymPy Documentation Style Guide that I'm putting together as
>>>>>> part of my Google Season of Docs project with SymPy
>>>>>> <https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/docs/participants/project-sympy>
>>>>>> is now available on the SymPy Wiki:
>>>>>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/SymPy-Documentation-Style-Guide
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You'll notice that some of the new guidelines in the guide are
>>>>>> qualified with a Work in Progress note and an issue number. These are
>>>>>> guidelines that are dependent on resolving certain issues in order for 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> guide to be implemented. If you are interested in working on any of these
>>>>>> issues, the full listing of Google Season of Docs related issues can be
>>>>>> found here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/milestone/54
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We would love to have some feedback from the SymPy community on the
>>>>>> first draft of this new style guide. In particular, we would like to know
>>>>>> your thoughts on these two issues:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. What do you think of the new order for docstring sections
>>>>>> <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/SymPy-Documentation-Style-Guide#docstring-sections>?
>>>>>> Do you think it is more helpful for examples to occur earlier in the
>>>>>> docstring to learn by example, or do you prefer to have all of the
>>>>>> information about a function, such as parameters, before seeing the
>>>>>> examples?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. How do you think docstrings for classes that are mathematical
>>>>>> functions
>>>>>> <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/SymPy-Documentation-Style-Guide#docstrings-for-classes-that-are-mathematical-functions>
>>>>>> differ from other docstrings? Are there any other details you would like 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> see included in this section?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please feel free to share any other feedback you may have about the
>>>>>> new guide. Please share any feedback you have by October 21st to allow 
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> ample time for concerns to be addressed. After October 21st I will be
>>>>>> finalizing the guide and starting the process to merge it with SymPy's
>>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you in advance for your thoughts and comments!
>>>>>> Lauren
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/8750f949-2fbc-491e-af40-a68feb6f5dbd%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/8750f949-2fbc-491e-af40-a68feb6f5dbd%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CANA%2BcPsci%3DFY94O_Kb4hzz%2Bau%3DE1t2tBXM%3DTrZJe4p4aDD8-xA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to