I have an A.I. degree from Stanford, and I've read Church, Post, Godel, and Kleene, and every time I try to use Sympy, I end up furious to the point of seriously considering quitting tech altogether. Just now I stupidly wondered whether the old assumptions would suffice for my task, and I stupidly tried to find their documentation via the table of contents, put that table of contents is still the same piece of shit it was last time I tried two years ago, so I don't know how your fucking assumptions work, but I do know how to implement my own fucking assumptions.
I'm 49, and the older I get, the less polite I get about shit software. On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 at 4:31:51 PM UTC-7 Oscar wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 21:38, My Name <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks trying to clear up Sympy's assumptions for me, but I get feeling > the only people who know how to use it are people familiar with the source > code. I may resort that, because Maple has brought me to a standstill, but > I might save time by building my own CAS from scratch to do what I need > done. Usually faster than deciphering other people's source code. > > I don't know what your particular task is but I'm fairly sure it would > be quicker to learn how to use sympy for your problem than to build > your own CAS. > > People here are pretty helpful if you ask your question in a > reasonable way. You could probably resolve any difficulties you have > with SymPy more efficiently by having a nice polite discussion here > rather than moaning! > > > Oscar > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/5c1ca389-4de4-4955-b2dc-edac485cd1f0n%40googlegroups.com.
