On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:10 AM Francesco Bonazzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 12:46:25 a.m. UTC+2 [email protected] wrote: >> >> Since we are bringing up SymPEPs again, it would be helpful to agree >> on the actual SymPEP process itself. There hasn't been much discussion >> on https://github.com/sympy/SymPEPs/pull/2 for a while. >> >> I was also hoping we could have a general PEP about dependencies and >> conditions for when something should be added as a hard or optional >> dependency. > > > The problem with SymPEP is that we will rarely use them. I mean, it's quite > rare to have a proposal for a major change in SymPy.
I agree SymPEPs will be rare and indeed should be rare. Such a formal process is only needed for major changes where we should try to avoid making bad decisions. I don't see how this is a problem though. I would say having such a formal process only be used rarely is a good thing. Aaron Meurer > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/e0680e96-8268-4bf8-ba9e-9afc75d42697n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6%2BC1H0CKX42334oQeDs-50j%3D8W%3DFSToXF78-kWKZKD6ZA%40mail.gmail.com.
