Also a couple of doubts which probably Aaron can answer, The google platform asks for project length, before submitting a proposal and also warns that the project length should be discussed with the organization .I believe mentors are aware that this year there are 2 possible project lengths (*175* hours and *350* hours).The project I have proposed is of 175 hours . I had mailed Aaron back in march when I heard this new rule introduction and discussed about flexibility of projects . I hope lack of discussion on this front is not a issue and mentors can judge the scope of the project according to the proposal .
Thanking You, Anurag Bhat. On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 11:05:59 PM UTC+5:30 Anurag Surendra Bhat (B20CS097) wrote: > Hi SymPy community and Jason ! > > A few days ago I had discussed about my project of interest - *Improving > And Extending SymPy's Control Module *and attached the initial draft of > my proposal. I had got a general response from Jason to focus on existing > bugs and adding good quality documentation. I have looked for bugs and > points for improving documentation .Those are currently mentioned in my > proposal ( SymPy GSOC'22 Proposal - Google Docs > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yPIbFQub1PL5mzDvOCP-upbApmy6PrTAJ9SL6DA5KM0/edit#> > ).I > have submitted this proposal now on the google summer of code online page. > > I would be glad if the community does a second review iteration of my > proposal. I would request if the maintainers of physics modules, specially > Jason and other mentors related to the control module could provide > detailed reviews as response to the current draft ( with due respect to > their busy schedules ). > > Regards, > Anurag Bhat. > IIT Jodhpur (2020-24) > On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 8:45:44 AM UTC+5:30 Anurag Surendra Bhat > (B20CS097) wrote: > >> Hi Jason, >> >> Thanks for your response, it is very much appreciated .Here are some >> pointers from my side. >> I will look to search and add more bugs to solve in the proposal .Some of >> them are mentioned in phase 2 part of the doc currently .Bug burn down is >> essential. >> Addition of text book examples for documentation is important as you >> mentioned. >> The new features I intend to add have already been discussed as scope for >> previous GSOC's and a good chunk of those are taken from Naman Gera's ( >> GSOC'19 contributor) unfinished work, as I have linked in my proposal. >> >> Regards, >> Anurag Bhat >> >> On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 1:48:56 PM UTC+5:30 [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Anurag, >>> >>> My general advice is to fix what is there, make it robust (by >>> demonstrating on a large set of example problems), and document it >>> extensively instead of adding new features. To gain users, it is better to >>> have a small number of features that work really well over a larger number >>> of features and a buggy, ill-documented package. The only way to find out >>> if the package is useful is to solve controls problems with it. The more >>> problems you solve with it, the more deficiencies and bugs appear. >>> >>> Jason >>> moorepants.info >>> +01 530-601-9791 <(530)%20601-9791> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 9:26 AM Anurag Surendra Bhat (B20CS097) < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Jason, >>>> >>>> I would request you and other mentors / maintainers of the physics >>>> module to have a look into it . I would be glad to have your reviews and >>>> suggestions. >>>> >>>> Thanking You, >>>> Anurag Bhat . >>>> >>>> On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 12:52:25 PM UTC+5:30 Anurag Surendra Bhat >>>> (B20CS097) wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello SymPy community, >>>>> As I had mailed a few days ago that I have started to draft a proposal >>>>> to improve and expand the control module in SymPy . You can go through >>>>> this >>>>> discussion for the ideas ( >>>>> https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/sympy/c/WpODTnY7Fh8 ). >>>>> I have completed it upto a good extent, so I thought I should be >>>>> sharing it . The proposal needs work in the phase 4 part and some fine >>>>> tuning in content / dates / references .I will be making the ideas more >>>>> concrete so that I can cement the proposal soon. I have added the >>>>> proposal >>>>> here - >>>>> GSoC 2022 Current Applications ยท sympy/sympy Wiki (github.com) >>>>> <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2022-Current-Applications> . >>>>> For easy access to mailing list members here is a link to my proposal - >>>>> SymPy GSOC'22 Proposal - Google Docs >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yPIbFQub1PL5mzDvOCP-upbApmy6PrTAJ9SL6DA5KM0/edit> >>>>> I have provided comment access to everyone so that the community can >>>>> react to my proposal and give reviews / suggestions . >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Anurag Bhat >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "sympy" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/4acee36c-2f8b-4814-9a57-a0b7fb818324n%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/4acee36c-2f8b-4814-9a57-a0b7fb818324n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/25ba90b2-9e58-4c63-804b-ba04d626991cn%40googlegroups.com.
