On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 19:26, Matthias Köppe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 5:17:22 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 7:44 PM Matthias Köppe <[email protected]> wrote: >> > We are in the early stages of planning an online SageDays event >> > (https://wiki.sagemath.org/days112.358). Wondering if some SymPy >> > developers would be interested in presenting? I think there's a lot of >> > potential for synergy between the projects. >> >> What sort of presentation would you like to see from SymPy? > > I'd be interested in:
I would be interested in coming along and can present on at least some of these things. > - General overview of recent-ish features of SymPy > - status and plans regarding use of FLINT - the Sage interface to it misses > many of the more recent developments in the FLINT 2.x series > (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31408), so there's a potential for synergy > here It would definitely be good to work together on this if possible. Does SAGE use its own bindings for flint? I've been working a little on python_flint e.g.: https://github.com/fredrik-johansson/python-flint/pull/20 The python_flint bindings still miss a lot of the newer features from flint, arb etc. A primary goal though is just to make it more easily installable. > - status and plans regarding SymEngine I don't know about the status of SymEngine. I can't say that I can see any significant work happening on the SymPy side to integrate SymEngine any further with SymPy. My personal view is that for faster symbolics a different approach is needed in general but SymEngine seems to have the same design flaws as SymPy itself in that respect. > - status and plans regarding solveset for several variables There are no immediate plans for a solveset for several variables beyond nonlinsolve. There was recent discussion about this on the mailing list here though: https://groups.google.com/g/sympy/c/v_YLkX4QuRY > - status and plans regarding the assumptions facility I think much like solveset etc there needs to be more organisation among sympy developers to define what the plans for things like this should be going forwards. These are the kinds of things that GSOC should really be used for rather than adding peripheral features. We need to make that clearer to GSOC applicants though. -- Oscar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAHVvXxTXK989ONibGvH9d3nSkPVJXDoEdS07gch%3D1-WnAFAtTg%40mail.gmail.com.
