I guess I'll write up a GSoC project proposal for improving the LaTeX 
parser and send it here soon.

As for mentor availability, do you have any ideas about who might be a good 
mentor for this project?

On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 1:33:29 PM UTC+5:30 Tirthankar Mazumder 
wrote:

> On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 3:16:22 AM UTC+5:30 [email protected] 
> wrote:
>
> There's been a lot of progress on the codegen module. I think you missed 
> this GSoC project which created it 
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2017-Report-Bj%C3%B6rn-Dahlgren:-Improved-code-generation-facilities.
>  
> We also currently have Sam Brockie working on codegen stuff (as well as 
> physics.mechanics) stuff as part of our CZI grant. The good news though is 
> that there is plenty to do, so having multiple people working on this is 
> definitely welcome. It might be a good idea to sync up with Sam if you are 
> interested in working on codegen to see what a good project might be.
>
> Ah, you're right, I *did* miss that 2017 GSoC project 😅 
>
> If you're interested in *any* parsing related project, I'd say the highest 
> priority project relating to parsing right now is to work on the LaTeX 
> parser, which is by far the most popular parsing tool in SymPy. We need to 
> rewrite it so that it uses a much lighter dependency than antlr. Lark has 
> been suggested, but we are open to other ideas as well. I would also like 
> to see it be possible for users to extend the parser at runtime, which is 
> currently impossible with the antlr parser. General improvements to its 
> parsing capabilities are needed as well (search the issue tracker for 
> issues related to parse_latex).
>
> That's actually a pretty interesting project idea. The fact that it's 
> widely used is a great motivator for me.
>
>  
>
> I would try to pick one or the other, parsing or codegen. While they can 
> be related, they are disjoint enough that they shouldn't be mashed together 
> into a single project proposal.
>
> That sounds like a good idea to me.
>
> You may also be interested in lfortran, which is a different GSoC 
> organization (
> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2023/organizations/fortran-lang),
>  
> but which has close ties to SymPy (Ondřej Čertík the creator of lfortran 
> was also the original creator of SymPy).
>
>  
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:59 AM Tirthankar Mazumder <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone, my name is Tirthankar Mazumder and I am a third year 
> undergraduate mathematics student in the Indian Institute of Technology, 
> Bombay. This year, I would like to do a GSoC project in either the parsing 
> or codegen submodules of SymPy.
>
> I've looked at the project ideas for both submodules, and also the 
> previous work done in those areas. I saw that there was an early GSoC 
> project in 2010 by Øyvind Jensen which essentially gave birth to the 
> autowrap stuff in the sympy.codegen submodule.
>
> Along with this, there were two more recent projects in 2015 and 2019 
> respectively, by Ankit Pandey and Nikhil Maan. Ankit added functionality 
> for generating Fortran code from the equivalent SymPy code using LFortran, 
> and also did some work in optimizing certain matrix codegen operations. 
> Nikhil setup the framework for and wrote most of the current C and Fortran 
> parsers.
>
> With this prior work in mind, I want to ask about three things to the 
> community:
> 1) Is there a mentor for this project, or someone willing to mentor for 
> this project? I know that last year, Anurag 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/sympy/c/xYoL_YlVyu8> had a very strong 
> proposal which was unfortunately not accepted as a GSoC project due to a 
> lack of mentors.
> 2) Even though I have used SymPy over the past two years for some 
> assignments and other projects, I have not used much of SymPy's codegen or 
> parsing capabilities beyond lambdify. What kind of use cases are these 
> submodules usually used for, and what kind of improvements (bug fixes, 
> feature requests, more documentation, etc.) would the community like to see 
> in these areas?
> 3) What are some of the possible GSoC projects could I do for these two 
> projects? (Note that while I am asking about information for both 
> submodules, I am fine with just contributing to one of these submodules.)
>
> The GSoC ideas page <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas> 
> mentions that a lot of work has been done in the intervening time between 
> now and the previous GSoC, and hence to ask about the current state of 
> affairs in these submodules.
>
> *parsing*:
> In the C parser, there are currently a few bugs (one of which I have been 
> working on <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/24954>), and the 
> transform_string_literal node code is left as a TODO. One of the things I 
> could do as a part of a parsing related GSoC is to fix these issues.
>
> Along with that, I could also perhaps add another language to the parsing 
> submodule (like, say, Rust/Julia/C++), but is there a demand for that? 
> Would it be worth the developer and maintainer effort to do something like 
> that? Are there other parsing related projects I could do?
>
> *codegen*:
> While I admit that I didn't poke around in the codegen submodule too much 
> (and hence am not too familiar with the current state of affairs), the GSoC 
> ideas page 
> <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas#code-generation> mentions 
> that adding support for more fnodes for Fortran, adding support for 
> OpenMP directives, and looking into optimized matrix codegen calls could be 
> a solid GSoC project. What are your thoughts on that?
>
> -- 
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/e6fe81be-fb43-4ffd-b189-c6682e31b217n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/e6fe81be-fb43-4ffd-b189-c6682e31b217n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/91f8fa32-2c08-47a2-a329-f20f1f4c7795n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to