There is a PR open <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/26225> for config files for ruff for the issue of slotchecks , Would you please take a look into it , it might be related to this thread as well . Almost all the things mentioned in the .flake8 file is also present in the ruff section . Kindly check if something is missing or if flake8 checks are being covered by ruff.
Shishir On Friday 16 February 2024 at 06:37:18 UTC+5:30 [email protected] wrote: > I think maybe there were some checks that were done by flake8 that > weren't yet implemented by ruff. I don't know if that's still the > case. I agree we could probably just use ruff if it is doing > everything flake8 does. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:50 AM Shishir Kushwaha > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I was going through the pyproject.toml file and learned that we are > using ruff which is also a test or part of a test that runs on github CLI . > In the documentation as well as github CLI we are using ruff which can be > used to replace flake8 from what I have read . > > In that case why do we use both of them when the work could just be done > with ruff . > > > > _____ > > Shishir Kushwaha > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sympy" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/33ecc4b9-d500-4233-ad3b-2ff5df3e56dbn%40googlegroups.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/bb116728-d2a5-4da0-88cb-e1d27188dbecn%40googlegroups.com.
