Your contributions are definitely welcome, although it would be a good idea to first lay out exactly what changes you want to make, either here or on an issue. If any of the changes are controversial, or would break the current API, we should iron them out before you potentially waste a lot of time coding them.
If there's any changes you want to make that aren't potentially controversial, like bugfixes, you don't need to open issues for them first. Aaron Meurer On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 2:02 PM Davide Pittet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > following up the discussion on GitHub related to the WedgeProduct bug, I > started exploring the code around the implementation of wedge and tensor > products. I think there are deep problems with the way tensor products (but > not only) are implemented in the diffgeom submodule. > > I would like to address these issues, but it would be my first contribution > and I do not think it will be a simple task. I have a good knowledge of the > theoretical field as my MSc thesis applied differential geometry to particle > physics and I would like to help, but I would surely appreciate some guidance > with the code, primarely on the direction we want to follow. > > Davide Pittet > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/f480cb78-3741-484a-bc32-1535cbab177bn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6KCBy4LEN%2BT3DrmrVkk2dsydXLpxQo9RY5eW1t_HX_EvA%40mail.gmail.com.
