Hi everyone,
It vedant Dusane from this side. As i am contributing to sympy from last
few month on one fix and* important issue* that will help sympy i*mproving
code safety, developer* *productivity, reduce future bugs*, and many more.
I have* merged some PRs* on Add type annotation. On that bases i am
planning to prepare a full GSoC scope.
I would like to propose the *project idea *related to the* improvement of
type annotations* and type safety within the *"sympy.polys"* system,
especially within* core files* such as *"polytools.py," "polyutils.py,"*
etc.
Polynomials is an elementary part of the computational algebra library
delivered by SymPy. Many of the *library’s higher-level functions* are
built upon the polynomial subsystem. As I was *conditioning* the type
annotations in *"polytools.py*", I saw that there are *certain functions*
that require type information that is *not available yet and uses generic
types.*
My proposed approach would be to:
1. Systematically* reviewing *the important *polynomial modules*
("polytools", "polyutils", "polyclasses" and "domains")
2. *Adding precise* and* correct type annotations* according to actual
return values and behavior
3. *Improved type clarity* for polynomial representations,* generators*,
and *domain interactions*
4. *Ensuring* complete compatibility with *existing behavior, correct
ruff format and passing all test cases and mypy checks*
The aim is to enhance maintainability, static correctness, and developer
experience without changing runtime functionality.
Any review or guidance will help me a lot
Thank you
- vedant Dusane
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/71db034f-f5a3-4a33-a65b-3601365b83ddn%40googlegroups.com.
