Miha Vrhovnik wrote: > Yeah, but that's just a few bytes, and this would be hardly > noticeable even if downloading a larger set of small messages . So > I'm not complaining about that. I'm complaining on e.g when > downloading like a 1M of messages where about 66% of messages in size > have been transfered and total progress is showing near 100%.
Based on the numbers you provided, I have a hunch; are you referring the message size *after* you've decoded it? If so, you need to take into account that if the message is (for example) Base64-encoded, it has some overhead due to the encoded values (as encoding packs multiple 8-byte values into even more 7-byte values). The overhead is approximately the size you're referring to. Other encodings have different sorts of overhead, but all in all, encoded messages are usually somewhat larger than their decoded counterparts. Once again, I might be totally off the tangent here, and if the scenario I've painted is not valid in this case, I sincerely apologise for having jumped to conclusions :) -- Markku Uttula ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
