background: i made a simple tcp/ssl send/receive client/server using fpc/synapse i started off using sendstring/recvpacket for sending stuff but while it works okay for simple typing text and text files and fpc runcommand results it gave bad 'binary' files (tgz png pdf etc) so since going through http://synapse.ararat.cz/doc/help/blcksock.TBlockSocket.html was a bit overkill for information to use to figure out what to use so looking around for a solution and finding https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php?topic=31488.0 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30778703/lazarus-freepascal-synapse-send-file-to-tcpblocksocket so now i use sendstreamraw(fs); // tstreamemory for sending 'binary' files and everything is fine --- my question: since the most common use of the program will be sending text files and using the sendstreamraw method with tfilestream works just as well as sendstring (from working vs not working viewpoint only) and thinking on simplifying the code to just use sendstreamraw for sending text files (treating all files as a single class of files rather then as text vs binary) is creating the tfilestream then using sendstreamraw fs := tfilestream.create(s, fmOpenRead); a more or less efficient method then just reading the file into a variable and then using sendstring any information on limitations/benefits/synapse internals/fpc compiler internals/timing etc of using the sendstreamraw vs sendstring methods would be appreciated --- _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list synalist-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
[Synalist] using sendstring vs sendstreamraw for text files
pastebin--- via synalist-public Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:53:52 -0700
- [Synalist] using sendstring vs sendstreamr... pastebin--- via synalist-public
- Re: [Synalist] using sendstring vs se... Lukas Gebauer