Re: M1 - SimpleHTTPServer only

Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:16:07 -0800

Saminda

+100!!!

We need the WAR file for M2.

Paul

On 1/4/06, Saminda Abeyruwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
+1 for using SimpleHTTPServer.

As considerable work has been done in generating the synapse.war on the fly, I would humbly ask, can we keep the necessary things for creating the war intact and  promote users to user SimpleHTTPServer. Can we keep this as a experimental feature.

Thank you

Saminda


On 1/4/06, Deepal Jayasinghe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for SimpleHTTPServer

Thanks,
 Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:04 PM
Subject: M1 - SimpleHTTPServer only

Folks

What do you think of just supporting SimpleHTTPServer in M1 --- in other words no WAR file?

Seems to me we should keep the M1 simple.

Paul

--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com




--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Reply via email to