Sure Sanjiva :) , and putting it in the scratch is a good idea at least people can comment on a concept and on acceptance we can put it in the main code base.
-----Original Message----- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:21 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Ruchith Fernando Subject: RE: [Synapse]RE: CryptoFactory:Cannotloadproperties:crypto.properties On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:48 +0530, Soumadeep wrote: > One more thing that I would like to emphasize here is that I do agree that > all the development should happen in the repo, but from a realistic stand > point as you may agree one can't keep writing a line of code and keep > committing it but surely the scratch area should be fine. Come on Soumadeep you know I didn't mean that every line should be committed. In fact there are times when I go days without committing changes because I'm not happy with some stuff. However, the diff is there's no other place where the code is committed in a shared repo; I may keep it on my machine for however long but from day 0 its meant to go to ASF and I keep committing when I feel its good and ready to commit. The only reason to commit to the scratch area instead of the main tree is if the stuff is really "scratch" .. otherwise if the code is an improvement to the main direction of the project it belongs in the main tree. Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
