+1 looks better as well
On 7/12/06, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before I post this on the Wiki or proceed any further, I would like your
comments on the following..:
The problem is around the existing language syntax which does not allow
us to properly validate a configuration through a schema. Let me take
the filter mediator as an example, and our configuration language states
the following :
<filter (source="xpath" regex="string") | xpath="xpath"> mediator+
</filter>
Shall we change this to
<filter xpath="xpath" [regex="string"]> mediator+ </filter> instead, so
that the schema provided for this mediator could be used to validate a
config using it?
The same goes for a few mediators as shown in the attached schema, and a
sample file which shows some examples with the proposed syntax.
asankha
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
