Yes +1
Paul On 11/8/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its quite easy right now to forget to implement the MediatorSerializer interface when you're implementing a new mediator. You have to implement the MediatorFactory interface as thats the only way to get the Mediator picked up by the runtime but nothing tells you that you should also implement MediatorSerializer. Is it the intention that every mediator should have an associated MediatorSerializer? If so how about moving the MediatorSerializer methods to the MediatorFactory interface so you have to implement them? ...ant On 11/7/06, indika kumara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > > > > > > I figure out that in current synapse distribution, There are no Test Cases for both Mediator Factories and MediatorSerializerers.I thinks It is better to have some Test Cases to assure functionality of those. I hope to working on creating Junit Test Cases for both Mediator Factories and MediatorSerializerers.I expect to follow ,following steps in developing Test Cases. > > > > > 1 Build a OMElement form a XML Stream – Input OM > > 2 Build a Mediator form that Input OM using Factory > > 3 Serialize a Mediator and get OM - Output OM > > 4 Compare Input OM and Output OM > > > Please give your comments on this... > > > > > Thanks > > Best Regards > > Indika > > > >
-- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
