Paul.

- make it possible to have more than one Synapse configuration flow 
instantiated when starting a Synapse server

What I mean with this is that as for as I know, one Synapse configuration flow 
is given as parameter when starting the Synapse serverr. By default Synapse 
searches for a synapse.xml file in the repository conf directory. If this is 
true, I think it would be a nice improvement to support multiple configuration 
flows in stead of only one.

I have not looked at the WSO2 console yet, I will do this shortly, thanks.

Quartz scheduling would be nice to support functionality to do bulk invocations 
to a service. So Synapse stores incoming messages and a specified time 
intervals a service is called with all the messages that have been sent to 
Synapse.

I agree with you that for 1.0 we should not do major additions and should focus 
on performance improvements etc.

Tijs

> 
> van: "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> datum: 2007/01/11 Thu AM 10:14:34 MET
> aan: [email protected]
> onderwerp: Re: 1.0 thoughts
> 
> Tijs
> 
> I'm not sure I understood this:
> 
> > - make it possible to have more than one Synapse configuration flow 
> > instantiated when starting a Synapse server
> 
> > - some kind of administrative console, this can very simple to begin with 
> > showing just the deployed flows and a possibility to deploy new flows and 
> > remove existing flows.
> 
> Have you seen the WSO2 console on top of Synapse? It is ASL licensed
> too, and fully open source. See here:
> http://wso2.org/projects/esb/java
> 
> 
> >  - support for WS-eventing via the Axis2 Savan module
> +1
> 
> > - integration with quartz to provide support for scheduling
> Can you give a use case?
> 
> I think we should start a wiki page to capture our plan. I personally
> wanted to do the Savan and some of the more complex aspects post 1.0.
> Here's my thinking:
> 
> Axis2 spent a long time at 0.9x. When they did go to 1.0, that is when
> they really got some users and feedback. The result is that the 1.1
> release was the really useful highly-tested version.
> 
> So I'd like to see if we can do a 1.0 in the next month or so to aim
> to get more downloads and involvement. Then we can start to add new
> function, and aim for a really cracking 1.1.
> 
> If we follow this path then the main aim of 1.0 would be just to
> stabilize any API or core architecture issues.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tijs
> >
> > >
> > > van: "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > datum: 2007/01/09 Tue PM 02:37:11 MET
> > > aan: [email protected]
> > > onderwerp: 1.0 thoughts
> > >
> > > Obviously the time is definitely here to have a 1.0 plan.
> > >
> > > The few things I've thought of are:
> > >
> > > 1) do some performance and scalability tests
> > > 2) get at least the framework in place for non-blocking IO
> > > 3) Add WSDL services - i.e. bootstrap the endpoints, MEPs, actions
> > > from the WSDL, including fetching the WSDL from a registry.
> > >
> > > What else?
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > --
> > > Paul Fremantle
> > > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > >
> > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> 
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to