+1 for the PojoCommand (POJOCommandMediator will be the class name) On 8/6/07, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul > > One final thing, maybe we should call this PojoCommand - since its > > both a Pojo and a Command? > > > +1 > >> The POJO mediator MUST be instantiated new for each message. Otherwise > >> you need to implement some reset() pattern, and I think that makes it > >> too complex. > Ok.. I was thinking if one wanted to pool these instances... but lets > address it later if users really want it > > asankha > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Ruwan Linton http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
