> Monitoring, attack mitigation, and security auditing don't seem unique to > couchdb.
Many of the concerns one might have about Couch are concerns one would have about most COTS software, or at least OTS document stores. I don't think that means they aren't concerns we have about applying Couch to this problem. > "Protocol Limitations" and perhaps "Scalability" and maybe "Data > Representation" (thinking that protocol limitations can pretty deeply affects > representation design, not everyone agrees). Yes; if a hypothetical protocol+server supported transactions, for example, we could use different representations. > Ok, I'm admitting we're going to have a pretty protracted conversation on > this tomorrow, and just wanted to ensure concerns were represented. > > I *think* I've done a fair job. We shall see! :} Yeah, only one way to find out :) It's an enormous topic. Will be there to help! _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
