Grafting a better sign up onto sync 1.1 has been talked about as a way to address usability problems in sync without having to deal with the complexity of the current implementation. A way to release a fix to sync faster.
Talking about this as a real option makes people really uncomfortable. I'd like to get to the heart of it. So I'd like to open a venting thread here. Let's capture once and for all the real, actual, user facing or implementation complexity downsides of implementing a new authentication flow and grafting it onto Sync 1.1. Assuming scalability could be addressed, why is this crazy? lloyd _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
