On 10/08/2013 12:57 AM, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Nick Alexander <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 13-08-09 5:35 AM, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote:
>>> 4. (chris karlof) Future Storage Implementation - This is defining the
>>> simplest storage protocol that can work reasonably across our initial
>>> data types, bound by the MVP definition.
>>
>> 5. (ryan kelly) Storage Server implementation? Kind of a big deal.
>
> +1
+1 :-)
However, I think we should leave "Storage" as a single project blob for
now, driven by client dev concerns. I will continue to veto anything
that looks too awful from a server-side perspective.
Once we get past this initial flurry of exploration and decision-making,
then we can split it into "Storage Client" and "Storage Server" and
drive them forward in parallel.
We're close on that front, but I don't think we're there yet.
Cheers,
Ryan
_______________________________________________
Sync-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
