Sorry, was away last week.

I'm very much in favor of an incremental approach that'll make the longer term 
goals easier, but I'm aware that for now it's entirely a client resource issue. 
If you folks can do it, I'm a +1.

Toby



On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:50 PM, Richard Newman <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Presumably, with this approach, if an older client overwrites the new field, 
>> then nothing bad happens. And we eventually converge on everyone supporting 
>> the new field as clients upgrade.
> 
> Old clients will do one of three things:
> 
> 1. Upload a new record that’s missing fields. New clients will shrug, sigh, 
> and go on with their day. We’ll probably want to have slightly smarter record 
> application logic than usual, to avoid throwing away local data unnecessarily 
> — e.g., if a client record goes from saying it’s a Windows machine to having 
> no opinion, we shouldn’t clear our local platform note.
> 
> 
> 2. Upload a modified record and preserve the fields.
> 
> This is only bad if somehow the additional fields should have been updated or 
> invalidated — for example, if an old client changes a password but leaves the 
> old password change timestamp intact.
> 
> Desktop Sync does scary things like mutate JSON bodies returned from the 
> server, but I don’t think it does so for engine records, so this should not 
> occur. Android doesn’t do such things at all, so it definitely won’t occur 
> there.
> 
> 
> 3. Barf when processing records with additional fields. I’m confident that 
> this won’t happen on any of our platforms.
> 
> The primary concern is that this is *very* lossy in a transition period — all 
> existing records, and any record uploaded by an old client, will be missing 
> the fields we’d like them to have. But this is strictly less painful than a 
> version bump, which would throw away existing records and lock out old 
> clients, so we’re taking the best option of a bad bunch.
> 
> 
> 
> It sounds like we have consensus, so I’ll move forward with bolting bits on 
> to support the work we’re doing.
> 
> Thanks, all!
> _______________________________________________
> Sync-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev

_______________________________________________
Sync-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev

Reply via email to