David Eriksson escreveu: > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 22:41 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > >> Ping? >> > > I've seen your patch but I haven't yet had time to investigate and give > a proper reply... > >
Thanks for answering. I was mostly interested in understanding if a Cygwin port is welcome, not this particular implementation; I'm happy to do the necessary cleanups, and split the patch into 'strict Cygwin port' + 'new features'/changes, if that is desired. > Once thing I'd like to avoid is the #ifdef WIN32 stuff. Maybe a Windows > version of rapi_connection_from_path() could be implemented and it does > the LoadLibrary stuff, for example. > > I thought RAPI/Activesync only supported one connection at a time, and that that was a Synce feature. I've googled around, and found no info on RAPI + multiple connections. Could you give me a hint on what to look for? I have no idea what would be the equivalent of rapi_connection_from_path on Windows. Maybe I should wrap the synce-only features in #ifdef __SYNCE__ or whatever, instead of in #ifdef WIN32, in case synce itself is ported to Windows as a testbed. Cheers, Pedro Alves > \David > > >> Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>> Hi again, >>> >>> I forgot to add a new file to the patch. Here it is attached. >>> It contains definitions for functions not found yet on the rapi.h header >>> from Cygwin (w32api), among >>> other compatibility things. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Pedro Alves >>> >>> Pedro Alves escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> The CeGCC project [1] has a need for a consistent set of rapi tools >>>> across linux and windows hosts. I took a stab at porting the >>>> librapi2/tools to Cygwin, and the attached patch is the result. The >>>> biggest change, is that I made the tools dir independent of its >>>> parent dir autoconf wise. Ideally it would be moved to the root dir, >>>> or somewhere else not directly under librapi2. This also has the >>>> advantage of having an example of an app that is ported to native >>>> rapi.dll and to the synce api, without much effort. >>>> I would be happy to clean this patch up before inclusion. I am seeking >>>> for opinions from the maintainers to understand if such a port >>>> would be accepted. >>>> >>>> I have been using this port for over two months to run the gdb testsuite >>>> against MSFT's WinCE emulator. The testsuite copies (pcp) and runs >>>> (prun) >>>> a few thousand apps in a single run in series without problems. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Pedro Alves >>>> >>>> P.S.: Is this list still appropriate? Seem like SynCE-windowsmobile2005 >>>> list has much more traffic these days. Also, should I rebase my patch >>>> against any branch? I'm confused as to where is the main development >>>> going on these days. (Granted; I didn't look enough, I'm lazy :) ) >>>> >>>> [1] http://cegcc.sourceforge.net >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Synce-devel mailing list Synce-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
