On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 22:47 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 22:40 +0100, Mark Ellis wrote:
> > What I think may be best then is to provide an option to vdccm to
> > disable what WM5 support exists, just so it is possible to support
> > anything on one machine.
> 
> I don't understand this. Just to be clear: vdccm supports pre-WM5 and
> WM5. odccm only supports WM5. odccm has a future, and vdccm does not
> (IMHO of course).
> 

Aha, I'll explain my reasoning. I'm just thinking short term fix here,
as a transition until odccm has pre WM5 support (maybe). odccm is the
preferred option for WM5, but currently for a complete solution vdccm is
needed for pre WM5. vdccm interferes with odccm because it has some WM5
support. Disable WM5 in vdccm to have optimal support for both pre
(vdccm) and WM5 (odccm) on the same machine.

I'm still a bit new to the dccm side, please tell me if i've made a
wrong assumption somewhere.

Ta
Mark




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel

Reply via email to