On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 20:46 +0100, David Eriksson wrote:
> I removed the function because it didn't do anything and prevented me
> from compiling with -Werror. As the line below (verbatim from r2779)
> shows, the call to the actual implementation was commented out, and with
> a C++ commment within C code.
>
> // return ( *context->rapi_ops->CeSetEndOfFile ) ( hFile );
>
> For some reason I removed the comment when I disabled the function.
> Anyway... I was hoping that if some people use this function, they would
> speak up and we could proceed to resolve this issue. That is where we
> are now! :-)
>
> I don't mind to enable this function in its entire, or that someone else
> does, but if this is the code in 0.10.0 I'm quite curious how everything
> function worked so fine when the call didn't do anything... :-)
>
I can't believe I left that code in that state - must have been one of
my more careless moments :(
I'll go check my notes to find out why, during development, I commented
this out in the first place. It's probably because I forgot to remove
the comment before committing it but had better check in case there is
something missing. Will keep you posted.
John.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
