On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 12:41 -0500, Paul Stanisci wrote: > > > > > Also, under "Base Install", should a sub page be created to explain the > > > difference between vdccm and odccm, and when to use each one? Should > > > users of non-WM5 devices continue to use vdccm, or will it soon be > > > deprecated? > > > > Unless someone steps forward, we'll only document odccm, which has a legacy > > mode to support WM2003 users. We've considered it deprecated for some time > > and will probably move it to legacy/ in svn for 0.11... > > > > If odccm will handle WM2003 and WM5 users, I guess there is little point to > document and maintain old version of dccm. Though, the documentation should > state that old version of dccm exist and that the user should use odccm > instead. >
Just a quick comment on the vdccm/odccm stance. AFAIK raki won't work with odccm, not sure about the rest of synce-kde because I don't use it. It would be nice if someone could implement odccm's dbus interface in raki, unfortunately my C++ is not up to the task. An interim possibility I've considered is a dummy vdccm that sits between odccm and synce-kde, but again, because I use gnome it's at the bottom of my list. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
