Hi again, Does anyone have any objections to me renaming the module "rra" to "librra". It is already called "librra" in distribution packages (E.g. [0]) and the name "librra" conforms more with other SynCE modules.
Of course, my rename would have no API change. Perhaps I could be enlightened as to why this module was called "rra" in the first place? After all, librapi2 contains a library and a number of tools, just as rra does. Thanks, [0] http://packages.debian.org/librra -- Jonny Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jonnylamb.com GPG: 0x2E039402
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
