On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 08:51 +0100, David Eriksson wrote:
> > So, can we either:
> >
> > 1. provide patches against latest libwbxml release (0.9.2) and not
> > svn version?
is this ruled out then?
> > 2. fork libwbxml and maintain it ourselves :)
> > 3. put the pressure on upstream again, to see if we can get a new
> > release (or any comment)? At the very least, a release of the
> > current svn snapshot would be fine, if option 1. isn't possible.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
>
> Pressure is not very good for motivating Open Source developers :-)
OK, I didn't mean "cough up a release and we'll return your pet dog" I
meant "hey what's up?"!
> Maybe you could check what other projects depend on libwbxml and see if we
> could work on a common cause?
> A couple of other options:
>
> 4. Ask if some of us could join the project
>
> 5. Ask if the current maintainer is willing to give away the project
> to us
that's kind of what I was thinking. I don't always choose the right
words. So does someone want to talk to him on behalf of SynCE?
> 6. Get rid of libwbxml as a dependency.
sounds good too!
thanks, I see some more responses just came in, so I'll go and read
those too...
--
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>
Another such victory over the Romans, and we are undone.
-- Pyrrhus
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
