On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 22:35 +0200, Tejas Guruswamy wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello everyone! > > New subscriber to the mailing list, long time SynCE user, I am > consistently impressed by how much you've been able to accomplish :) But > enough of the flattery. > > Firstly, I was bored and so I ported kio_rapip to KDE4/Qt4. I noticed a > few others were asking for it and I wanted it myself so instead of > bugging you guys I had a go at it. I've currently been using Google code > (mostly just to see what they were offering) to host it, check it out at > http://code.google.com/p/kde4-kio-rapip/. > Now I'm no C/C++ developer, what I've done is read the Porting to KDE4 > and Porting to Qt4.4 pages on the web and just fixed stuff until the > compiler stopped complaining (extensive use of find+replace), so it's > not perfect, but it WFM :) The changes are quite minor, in most cases > just renames, no logic changes. One major change is that it builds using > cmake as with the rest of KDE4, look at the installation instructions if > you are unsure. > I've got it working with WM2003 and WM2005 devices in Dolphin and > Konqueror, read, write, delete, etc. I've tested mainly with > KDE4.0(release)/Qt4.4 on openSUSE 10.3 and 11.0. If you experience any > issues, let me know. BTW I haven't yet tried with KDE4.1betas. What I > would love to see is some basic integration into synce-kpm since that > seems to be the frontend for stuff now. Just a link to open > rapip://DEVICENAME/ for every device you have connected, like raki did. >
Excellent ! I was hoping some kde'er would do that. I'll try and have a look soon, and probably update our svn. > Second, I had a query about the ppp options used to connect WM2003 > serial devices in synce-hal. When I first installed it on openSUSE 11.0 > it didn't work, a little digging around showed that ppp wasn't giving up > control, i.e. "updetach" wasn't being used. Looking at the code in > hal/hal-synce-serial showed that it was there, but separate from the > other options inside an "if [ -t 1 ]" (see line 62). Moving it outside > the if-block makes it work for me. Is there any harm done by doing that? > As far as I know, you're the only one having this problem. I can't see how it would make that much difference, I'll ruminate on it. Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
