On Tuesday 23 September 2008 18:28:32 John Carr wrote: > Doing IRC support for synce means you see some things a lot. This is > one of them. People see synce-kde and synce-gnome and think, as a > gnome, they should use synce-gnome. The thing is, they really > shouldn't. > > Up until recently, the only real file in that part of the repository > was called test.py. At some point, we renamed it to synce-gnome, threw > a setup.py and released it. But if you examine it, within the first 10 > lines you will still see "TestApp". It is about as old as odccm and > was created to test out some of the odccm dbus API. Currently its only > useful function it has is to deal with user passwords. It also has no > hal-dccm support. It is called synce-gnome, but the extent of its > gnome integration is that it has a GTK password entry box. It doesn't > even have an icon, install a menu item or start as part of the > session. For an end user, it kinda sucks. > > synce-trayicon more than removes the need for synce-gnome. I think > even synce-sync-engine can handle passwords on its own (if it needs > to). > > So does anyone have any objections to me moving synce-gnome to the > obsolete branch?
No objections here. I really don't think that synce-gnome is useful in any way anymore. +1 on the svn mv ;) Guido -- Guido Diepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Aviation is proof that given the will, we have the capacity to achieve the impossible. --Eddie Rickenbacker ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel