On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 11:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > OK, thanks for the info. Is there any reason to *not* include the > > samsung patch with the kernel module? That saves me having two different > > packages. TBH there is no need for me to build packages for anything > > before openSUSE 10.3 which was kernel version 2.6.22 ... I don't know > > how much had been merged by then. > > Er, remind me again about the Samsung patch :)
jc reminds me that the 'Samsung patch' is what I usually refer to as the 'dirty patch'. No, AFAIK, there's no reason to separate it out. We haven't yet found any real-world situation where it causes any regressions. -- adamw ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
