On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 01:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 23:59 +0200, Pawel Kot wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 22:26, Pawel Kot <gno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > IMHO:
> > >  - WORK/HOME without subtype should be treated as VOICE.
> > >  - Telephone[Type='VOICE'] with no other subtype should be mapped for
> > > something. I don't know XML Schema for Contact on WM6 devices but if
> > > there's just what's shown in the log available (ie. no general/default
> > > phone number), I'd suggest map it into C1:MobilePhoneNumber (or using
> > > gui/cli attempt the user interaction to ask for the type).
> > 
> > I'd like to confirm that using
> > http://tfuj.pl/osync/contact-to-airsync.xsl I was able to successfully
> > synchronize contacts from Nokia 6230i to HP iPAQ 514 (modulo encoding
> > problem I was mentioning earlier).
> 
> Resurrecting this old thread, I would like to note that one of Pawel's
> changes appears to be bogus. He changes Type='HOME' and Type='VOICE' to
> Type='HOME' and Type!='FAX' and Type='WORK' and Type='VOICE' to
> Type='WORK' and Type!='FAX' , which is fine, and seems to fix the
> problem he was trying to address (and that I also ran into, with
> Blackberries). However, his .xsl has the following, further difference
> from the current one in synce itself. It adds:
> 
> <C1:MobilePhoneNumber>
> <xsl:value-of select="Telephone[Type='VOICE']/Content"/>
> </C1:MobilePhoneNumber>
> 
> underneath:
> 
> <C1:MobilePhoneNumber>
> <xsl:value-of select="Telephone[Type='CELL']/Content"/>
> </C1:MobilePhoneNumber>
> 
> this appears to have the effect of over-riding the CELL entry
> completely, so with Pawel's version, *only* Tel entries with the type
> VOICE will get written as MobilePhoneNumber. Tel entries with the type
> CELL don't get written at all, as far as I can tell.
> 
> I had a ton of contacts in Evolution whose cellphone numbers were lost
> when I sync'ed to my new WM phone, because I was using Pawel's
> contact-to-airsync.xml. When I reverted this last change, the cell
> numbers synced properly. So that change is bogus, I think.

Resurrecting this thread again - why hasn't this patch yet been merged?
I can't see any reason it shouldn't be.

(I'm sending this from @mandriva.com because I haven't yet been un-lazy
enough to update my mailing list subscriptions! But I'm looking at this
stuff for Fedora, now.)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
SynCE-Devel mailing list
SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel

Reply via email to