> The secondary subject should be "that I will probably never get around to" :), but if I do I think it will be shortly after the next release. > > Wanted to bounce this around, see what everyone thought. At the moment we have 2 libraries that are basically a waste of space without each other, libsynce and librapi2, and both of these are pretty pointless without a dccm. They also all have to match in versions or things go bad fast. > > So, I thought once I'd sorted out synce-connector, a hal/udev/manual connection replacement for synce-hal, I would combine the two libraries and connector into one package, and call it synce-core or even just synce. > > Good idea ?
+1 Best regards, David http://www.divideandconquer.se/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
