http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7089





--- Comment #29 from pohly <[email protected]>  2010-01-06 01:49:16 PST ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > (In reply to comment #25)
> > > It seems to me that both dbus server and dbus client have to be aware of
> > > bluetooth service and handle many logics. I think maybe many logics and
> > > processing are overlapped.
> > 
> > The D-Bus client doesn't have to implement much logic:
> > - get all configs and templates
> > - understand enough of syncURL to find the device it was invoked for
> > 
> > It does not talk to bluez directly, nor does it implement any kind of 
> > matching
> > logic.
> Sync-ui has to get device name from bluez. See below:
> ‣ Jku's N85 (Bluetooth device)     
>        Enter your device manufacturer and model name   [                   ]
>        or select from list of templates                [Nokia S60 3rd ed. ∨]
> Device name is different from model name. A possible solution is to add a new
> property 'device name' in GetConfig. then it doesn't need it, I think.

My understanding was that we would add everything that is needed by the sync-ui
to the templates, exactly to avoid the sync-ui<->bluez dependency.

> > Do you expect the GUI to do more than that? Where do you see an overlap in
> > functionality?
> If user inputs a new finger information for a given device, since we have no
> API to transfer this to dbus server, gui has to do matching against 'phone
> model number' itself. This logic is also in syncevolution core.

"inputs new finger information" - do you mean that the user enters manufacturer
and model manually, then asks to create a config without having that device
paired? I don't think we need to support such a use-case. If we do, we'll add
the necessary D-Bus API to keep the matching inside the server.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Syncevolution-issues mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution-issues

Reply via email to