http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10092

pohly <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #6 from pohly <[email protected]> 2010-12-13 07:50:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Not sure how to work around this. One possibility would be to remove the end
> > date before sending to the phone, but that changes the semantic of the 
> > event.
> 
> i agree, this is not the right way to handle it
> 
> > Do events with a repeat count ("repeat for x occurrences" instead of "repeat
> > until xyz") work with the phone? That might be a better workaround.  
> 
> Yes, they work:
> 
> While RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;COUNT=4 does the job, RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;UNTIL=20101120
> only shows the first event on the phone.

I think I fixed this issue as part of bug #11241, without realizing it at
first. The root cause of #11241 is that UNTIL=20101120 in iCalendar 2.0 leads
to an invalid RRULE being sent in the vCalendar 1.0 item. COUNT=4 takes a
slightly different code path and ends up sending a valid RRULE (bug #11241
comment #1).

Can you try this with the SyncEvolution 1.1.0.99.1 that I am going to release
this week? I'll announce it on mailing list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.meego.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Syncevolution-issues mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution-issues

Reply via email to