Patrick Ohly wrote:
Setting sync modes in the Sync() method is a special case for a more general problem (temporarily overriding the config). My thinking was that we need a solution for that general problem (do we?) and then the special case is no longer needed. But the special case is so common, perhaps it really deserves special treatment?
I note I didn't comment on this at all yet... Probably because I haven't understood the need: What are the other (client side) use cases of temporarily overriding parts of the config? I can't really think of anything.
- Jussi _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
