On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:28 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > Is this API okay? It's in the "dbus-api" branch, please comment and/or
> > suggest further patches.
> 
> Looks ok. Session only has a query method and no signal, but I suppose 
> that's by design?

Yes. The corresponding signals are in the Server, which is also where
the API for enabling/disabling active scanning will be. I didn't want to
duplicate that in the Session.


-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to