On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:34 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > Patrick Ohly wrote: > > So what does the sync-ui check at the moment? Is the "diable sync > > because unconnected" an --enable-gui=moblin exclusive feature because we > > only support ConnMan? > > Yes, although without any compile time checks. I just connect to > org.Moblin.Connman PropertyChanged. > > Same could be done with NM and ConIC. It'll be one init function and and > one signal handler per API. I did a "network abstraction" thingy in > geoclue once but I think that was overkill. Is there a downside to just > listening to all of the interfaces we care about all the time?
No, that should work fine. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
