On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 10:14 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
[compiling 0.9.x from source difficult]
> I don't remember what exactly was wrong, it's more than a month ago; I just 
> know that 
> simply going the confige/make/make install route as in V0.7/V0.8 didn't work. 
> It took 
> some googling and trial and error especially during the configure stage to 
> reach 
> "make install" finally.
> 
> I know this isn't helpful.
> 
> I'd like to continue playing with it in scratchbox, anyway, where everything 
> was
> even worse, so I might be able to recall some of the dirty details once I'm 
> there
> again... If your still interested. ;)

Yes, definitely.

> > > [ERROR] calendar: could not read revision identifier for item
> > > pas-id-419B999600000002-birthday-rid: only refresh-from-client 
> > synchronization
> > > is supported
> > 
> > Hmm, we might have a code path in 0.9 which triggers this exception. I
> > don't remember how it worked in 0.8, but this code probably has changed.
> > I'll check.
> 
> 
> Thanks. Syncevolution has become a part of my life and I'd hate to miss some 
> of its
> functionality.

I tried to reproduce the problem, but for me, refresh-from-client syncs
between the Birthday calendar and ScheduleWorld works fine. I tried with
SyncEvolution 0.9.1 (tagged, but not announced yet) compiled from source
and 0.9.1 beta 2.

Are you 100% sure that the sync is run in "refresh-from-client" mode?
The relevant INFO line in my case is:

[INFO] calendar: starting first time sync from client

and later:

+---------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-----+
|      birthday |  0/0  |  0/0  |  0/0  | 0/17  |  0/0  |  0/0  |  0  |
|      refresh-from-client, 6 KB sent by client, 0 KB received        |
|      item(s) in database backup: 17 before sync, 17 after it        |
+---------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-----+

I've created an issue for this, but feel free to respond here.
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7759


-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to