>I'd prefer not to change this. If there is a need, we could introduce an
>additional getPeerMimeType() call in SyncSource which
That's also acceptable..
>Is the MIME type in the SAN message really needed by a peer? According
>to the discussions with Synthesis, the usefulness of specifying it is
>dubious because a) not all possible MIME types ("text/x-my-own-format")
>can be represented in the binary format used in the SAN message anyway
>and b) the URI also determines the format.
>
This is what I found during testing with the Nokia phone. If MIME type is not
set (=0),
the phone will complain "not supported type to sync".
--
Regards,
Congwu
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
