On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 09:49 +0000, Chen, Congwu wrote: > Patrick wrote: > >On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:26 +0000, Chen Congwu wrote: > >"Refresh-from-server", not "refresh-from-client"? I would test data > >conversion like this: > > * send items to device > > * retrieve back from device, either via "refresh-from-client" or > > wiping out data on the server + slow sync > > > >This looks useful and doable to me. As with HTTP SyncML servers, > >verification that both sides have the same semantic interpretation of > >the data is a manual task. > I hope I can write such tests in python but it seems the dbus api is not > enough: > How can I delete/insert items in local sources during test?
This is indeed not part of the API. Sticking with the C++ client-test also for phones seems like the better choice at the moment. Perhaps someone wants to write a Python binding for the relevant classes? I started with that about two years ago with Boost++ Python, it was really easy. Not enough time before SyncEvolution 1.0 though. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
