>I've looked at the code. Some comments:
>
>    Server Alerted Sync: SAN generation
>
>    ContentType in the 'Get' command during the SAN should be XML or
>WBXML instead
>    of SAN Notification.
>
>Why that? Perhaps I misunderstand the code, but doesn't it ensure that
>the content type for the SAN message is
>TransportAgent::m_contentTypeServerAlertedNotificationDS and *not* XML
>or WBXML?
It means the request sent for SAN must have a san content type but when you use 
"Get" to pull response you must use XML/WBXML. 
This is found by Nokia phone and it is reasonable.
>
>    FileSyncSource: use x-vcalendar instead of x-calendar
>
>This changes user-visible behavior, and not just in the FileSyncSource,
>doesn't it? I agree that x-vcalendar is the better choice, but
>x-calendar should still be accepted for users who have it in their
>configs.
Yes, I just thought this was a typo. 
Agree, anyway it breaks FileSyncSource with vcal2.1, I believe. No time to 
check today, I 
may come out a patch for FileSyncSource later.

>    Join/dejoin Mutiple SyncSources, MB#4611
>
>Can you move the escape code for the new virtual backend's
>evolutionsource property into util.cpp? It's likely that we'll also need
>it for multiple syncURLs.
>
>+ "If the backend is a virtual data source, \n"
>+ "this field points a comma seperated list of \n"
>+ "sub datasources actually used for syncing.\n"
>+ "If your sub datastore has comma in name, you\n"
>+ "can separated by preceding it with '\\' \n"
>
>Extra white space - evil! ;-) Spelling improvement:
>
>"If the backend is a virtual data source,\n"
>"this field must contain a comma separated list of\n"
>"sub datasources actually used to store data.\n"
>"If your sub datasource has a comma in its name, you\n"
>"must prevent that comma from being mistaken as the\n"
>"separator by preceding it with a backslash, like this:\n"
>"   evolutionsource = Source1PartA\,PartB, Source2\\Backslash\n"
>
Yes, done.

Best Regards,
Congwu

_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to