>This will indeed cause duplicate source alerts in SAN but now failing
> the phone at the moment.
==>
>This will indeed cause duplicate source alerts in SAN but *not* failing
> the phone at the moment.

Best Regards,
Congwu

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chen,
>Congwu
>Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:44 AM
>To: Ohly, Patrick
>Cc: SyncEvolution
>Subject: Re: [SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution 1.0 alpha 1: SyncML server, syncs
>with phone
>
>Patrick wrote:
>>On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 07:03 +0000, Chen, Congwu wrote:
>>=> http://syncevolution.org/development/sync-phone
>>
>>Some questions about this:
>>     1. Is setting remoteIdentifier necessary? I remember that you found
>>        it to be unnecessary. As long as we are unsure how exactly
>>        phones identify their peers (MAC address or identifier?), we
>>        might be better of not setting remoteIdentifier and thus using
>>        the unique deviceId instead, to allow syncing the same phone
>>        with multiple desktops. Setting "remoteIdentifier=PC Suite" then
>>        becomes a tip for users of phones which depend on it.... [a bit
>>        later]... you already have it under "trouble shooting", so I
>>        think it can be removed at the beginning.
>>     2. When enabling "super" datastore, a hint is needed that this does
>>        not yet work as described with 1.0 alpha 1 (MB #8424). As a
>>        workaround, manually creating the source first should do the
>>        trick (mkdir ~/.config/default/sources/super).
>Accept.
>>     3. When using a "super" datastore, should the user do
>>        "syncevolution myphone super" or "syncevolution myphone
>>calendar
>>        todo"? It seems that setting "uri=super" for calendar and todo
>>        makes the later possible, but doesn't that lead to duplicate
>>        entries in the SAN? "syncevolution myphone super" might not work
>>        because "uri" is not set - is that necessary?
>It is expected to be used by:
>"syncevolution myphone calendar" to sync with one type or
>"syncevolution myphone calendar todo" to sync with both. This will indeed
>cause duplicate
>source alerts in SAN but now failing the phone at the moment.
>"syncevolution myphone super" is not working. Perhaps we will also support
>this?
>
>>     4. Troubleshooting "3. Change your database name" -> Change your
>>        URI, right? The local database name remains fixed, only the name
>>        specified via the "uri" property can be changed.
>Correct!
>>--
>Best Regards,
>Congwu
>_______________________________________________
>SyncEvolution mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to