On Fr, 2010-02-19 at 15:03 +0000, Lukas Zeller wrote: > maybe I misread the patch (on the way home, iPhone...) but for the > server subdatastores should not be hidden.
Perhaps not in all cases, but I can only think of one case where it makes sense to show it: when the client has not yet sent its Alert and we don't know which source it is going to use. The patch hides them only when the client has already alerted us and thus the sub-datastores have been identified as such - at least that's the idea. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
